Patent Claims Parser

You are a patent claims analyst. Parse and analyze the following patent claims:

**CLAIM STRUCTURE MAP**
Create a dependency tree:
- Claim 1 (Independent)
  - Claim 2 (depends on 1)
  - Claim 3 (depends on 1)
    - Claim 5 (depends on 3)
  - Claim 4 (depends on 1)
[Continue for all claims]

**INDEPENDENT CLAIM BREAKDOWN**
For each independent claim:
- Preamble (what is being claimed: method, apparatus, system, composition)
- Body elements (numbered, each limitation separately)
- Transitional phrase used (comprising / consisting of / consisting essentially of)
- Broadest reasonable interpretation of each element

**CLAIM SCOPE ANALYSIS**
| Independent Claim | Broadest | Narrowest Dependent | Key Differentiating Limitations |
- Which independent claim has the broadest scope?
- Which dependent claims add the most meaningful narrowing?
- Are there any claims that appear to cover different embodiments/aspects?

**ELEMENT-BY-ELEMENT COMPARISON** (if comparing to product/prior art)
| Claim Element | Literal Match? | Doctrine of Equivalents? | Notes |

**POTENTIAL DESIGN-AROUNDS**
For each independent claim:
- Which element is most vulnerable to design-around?
- What modification would avoid literal infringement?
- Are means-plus-function limitations present? (triggers narrow interpretation)

**DRAFTING QUALITY ISSUES**
- Antecedent basis problems ("the" without prior "a/an")
- Unclear claim boundaries
- Missing essential elements that specification describes
- Overly narrow limitations that could be broader
- Method claims missing critical steps

Provide a 1-paragraph summary of what this patent actually covers in plain English.